OFL News

Each month Katrina will be providing you with information as to what has been “happening” at Oner Family Law.  This will highlight the many different areas of family law in which we practice.

June

• We prepared trial affidavit documents for the relocation matter referenced in May below.  Preparation of trial documents takes a significant amount of time and working with your client is key to meeting Court Ordered filing deadlines.
• We prepared Court documents in response to an application for property settlement filed by the other party.  The other party only sought final property settlement Orders in their application, however, in our response documents, given the significant financial disparity between the parties’ respective earning capacities, we sought interim Orders for spousal maintenance on our client’s behalf.
• We appeared on behalf of a father where he is the primary carer of the children at the first return date of a matter, where due to concerns for the children’s safety while in the mother’s care, the mother is to have only supervised time with the children pending the matter progressing through the Court and a Family Report and Psychiatric Report being obtained.

May

• We attended at the interim hearing of a parenting matter where the other parent relocated the subject children to another State without our client’s consent, or without Court Order allowing the relocation.  The Court took the view the matter was urgent, and set the matter down for a final hearing to take place within a couple of months.
• We resolved a defacto property settlement matter at a Court Ordered Conciliation Conference in circumstances where the end date of the defacto relationship between the parties was in dispute by a number of years, as was whether a prior, informal defacto property settlement had already taken place.  The matter was settled on favourable terms to our client who was able to move on with her life after the final, agreed to settlement.
• We received instructions to document a number of agreed to property settlement matters negotiated directly between the parties.  In such circumstances we offer a fixed fee to document and finalise Application for Consent Order documents.

April

• This was a busy month with regard to trust compliance matters.  Each year law practices who hold trust funds are required to undergo an audit of their trust account practices.  We, as per usual, complied with all audit requirements with no issues of concern being identified.  Oner Family Law takes the holding of their client’s trust funds very seriously.

March 2022

• This month we prepared for, and attended at a mediation for a complex property matter where a number of factors such as significant income disparity, financial resources, and values of assets were all in dispute.  While significant progress was made at mediation, this was one of the very, very limited matters where we attended at mediation where the matter did not settle.
• We appeared at the first return date of a financial matter where the party on the other side had done nothing whatsoever to comply with the Court’s Rules and Pre-Action Procedures.  The other side had not filed their Response material, had not complied with their disclosure obligations, and had done nothing at all to attempt settlement of the matter, ultimately requiring our client to commence Court proceedings.  At the first return date, due to the other party’s non-compliance with the Court’s Rules and Pre-Action Procedures, we were successful in obtaining a Costs Order against the other party.
• We finalised on favourable terms to our client, a property settlement matter which had been running for nearly 18 months, mainly due to the other side’s reluctance to the progress the matter.  As a result of the delay we commenced Court proceedings on our client’s behalf which forced the other party to finally co-operate, with a negotiated final property settlement agreed to very quickly after Court proceedings were commenced.

February 2022

• This month the devastating floods caused havoc with Queenslanders and our focus was on keeping our staff and their families safe by working from home and ensuring our clients were also safe by rescheduling mediations in circumstances where it was safer for everyone to stay home during the damaging weather.

January 2022

• As normally happens during January, after the Christmas and festive period, we had a very high number of initial enquiries from people seeking to separate from their partners.  It is not uncommon for people wanting to separate to wait until after the holidays before starting the separation process.
• We acted for a parent at a child mediation where the other parent sought to change a recently agreed to final parenting Order whereby the child lived with the parents in an equal, shared care arrangement.  We very strongly maintained our client’s position at mediation that a change to the child Order would not be agreed to and the other parent did not pursue a change to the Order through the Court.  The original Court Order remained in place.
• We managed to keep a child matter out of Court regarding an infant by negotiating the terms of an interim Parenting Plan to be reviewed after six months when the child was older.

December 2021

• And we wrap up the year with a two day parenting trial, filing urgent Court proceedings in a new child matter, and being frantically busy with new appointments/clients which are all “urgent”, and a well deserved break for the OFL team, noting our office will close from close of business Friday 17 December, re-opening Tuesday 4 January.  From all of the OFL team, we wish you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year and look forward to updating you with our goings on in the New Year.

November 2021

• The best news of the year for the OFL team was learning that Emma Williams of our office, Senior Associate, had passed her family law specialist accreditation assessment!  This was huge news as it is very, very difficult to pass the accreditation assessment which is only offered by the Queensland Law Society every two years.  The failure rate is also much higher than the pass rate and Emma studied extremely hard for many months in preparation of all the assessments involved. Congratulations Emma.  A huge, huge achievement! Just goes to show how very knowledgeable Emma is in the specialised field of family law.

October 2021

• We appeared in Court in domestic violence proceedings on behalf of a husband where it was alleged by him that the wife due to mental health issues had been domestically violent toward the children and himself.  After lengthy negotiations with the wife, the wife agreed to a Temporary Protection Order being made against her in favour of the husband, and which also named the children as protected persons.
• We received instructions to act on behalf of a client in a complex property settlement matter where many corporate entities and trusts are involved with inter-company loans and where the parties wanting to “detangle” all the entities and financially separate themselves from each other, will take some significant work to finalise, with the drafting of the Court Order finalising the property settlement to be very important in due course.
• We attended at a property settlement mediation involving farming properties and cattle which settled on very favourable terms to our client.  Our client’s family had also made very significant financial contributions to the parties’ net asset pool to be divided between them which was ultimately taken into account by the other party at the mediation, where it had previously not been given any consideration by the other party throughout the matter.

September 2021

• We were busy preparing for, and again appearing in Court for the urgent child Court proceedings where the children had to be returned to our client by the Police pursuant to  Recovery Order as referenced in our June update below.  The other parent challenged the Order previously made and sought that the children live with that parent.  That argument was unsuccessful and the Court Ordered that the children continue to live primarily with our client, pending a final hearing taking place.
• We appeared at an interim hearing of a children’s matter where two young children had been unilaterally removed from our client’s care (the primary carer since birth) with the other parent taking the position that the children would not be returned to/be permitted to spend any time with our client unless our client agreed to the other parent’s terms – which were that the children live with the parties in an equal week on/week off arrangement.  The Court agreed with our position and the children were returned to our client’s primary carer.
• We settled a property settlement matter fairly quickly where the other side had unusually commenced Court proceedings for property settlement where absolutely no negotiation had taken place between the parties or their solicitors.  We managed to settle the matter on very favourable terms to our client early on in the proceedings, saving our client both significantly in legal fees and stress.

August 2021

• We ran a complex interim children’s hearing for a client whose former partner suffered from a mental illness which that party was refusing to be medicated for, as that party would not accept the mental illness diagnosis.  We sought an Order that the children live primarily with our client and spend regular time with the other parent.  The other parent sought an Order that the children live equally with both parties.  Our client’s case was that an equal time living arrangement was not in the children’s best interests due to the other parent refusing to accept the mental illness diagnosis and be medicated for it, therefore negatively impacting the children.  We were successful in our argument and our client’s Orders were made.
• We settled on a final basis a complex property and children’s matter which involved us drafting Application for Consent Order documents finalising the child and property agreements reached, a Binding Child Support Agreement documenting the parties’ private child support agreement, and a Financial Agreement extinguishing spousal maintenance.
• We received instructions to act on behalf of a client in a property settlement matter where the value of the former relationship home was significantly in dispute.  The parties agreed to obtain an independent, single expert valuation and that particular issue was resolved.

July 2021

• The hearing of the relocation matter referenced in June below took place, with the matter settling by consent without the matter proceeding to hearing.  This was as a result of the very detailed and very well prepared material filed on our client’s behalf.
• We represented our client at a mediation with a baby involved, where we had to negotiate appropriate time for the other party to spend with the baby, while keeping in mind the baby’s needs  We successfully reached an interim agreement.
• We had a very, very busy month with new initial consults this month, covering a wide range of family law issues.

June 2021

• We were required to file urgent Court proceedings seeking a Recovery Order for the return of children who were unilaterally removed from our client’s care and who were removed from their school by the other parent.  The other parent disappeared with the children. We obtained an urgent hearing date and our client was successful in obtaining the Recovery Order and the children were returned to our client’s care. Unfortunately the assistance of the Police was required in having the children returned.
• We were also busy preparing significant affidavit and subpoena material for a trial to be heard in July where our client sought to relocate with the children for work, child schooling, and family support issues.  This was vehemently opposed by the other parent, with the other parent seeking equal care of the children and an Order that the other parent not be permitted to relocate.
• We spent significant time inspecting subpoeaned documents on a matter where mental health issues of one of the parties was a significant factor in a parenting dispute.  The content of the subpoenaed documents was to form a large part of our client’s case when the matter proceeded to Court.

May 2021

• We were forced to file urgent Court proceedings in a matter where how the net sale proceeds from the sale of a property are to be dealt with at settlement.  As agreement was unable to be reached with the other side, our client now requires Court Orders directing that the net sale proceeds not be dealt with/distributed to either party pending the dispute being finalised either by agreement between the parties or by Court Order.
• All our solicitors were extremely busy this month with new enquiries, ranging from financial, child related, divorce, prenuptial agreements, domestic violence, child safety and relocation matters.  We’ve had it all this month!
• We managed to settle a property matter whereby we had initially registered on our client’s behalf a caveat against a property subject to division between the parties, but registered solely in the other party’s name.  Upon settlement, the caveat was withdrawn and our client received their settlement payout.

April 2021

• We commenced property settlement proceedings on behalf of a client in a complex, rural farming matter, where we are required to seek very detailed and specific Orders from the Court as to the valuation of real estate, motor vehicles, farming assets, cattle, and furniture and contents of the parties.  Retrospective valuations of real estate are also required, which will be relevant in determining the applicable contribution adjustments to be made in both parties’ favour regarding gifted assets from respective family members throughout their relationship.
• We attended at a property mediation with a client in circumstances where the other party’s historical criminal record was of relevance as to how the property between the parties accumulated throughout their relationship should be divided between them.
• We prepared a very complicated set of Consent Order documents regarding property matters, where one of the parties is subject to current criminal proceedings and where Court Orders made in the criminal law jurisdiction, have a direct impact on the family law Consent Orders being finalised between the parties.  This matter has required the co-operation of differing solicitors, working in differing jurisdictions.

March 2021

• We finalised a complicated set of child Consent Orders where the father lives interstate and the mother lives in Queensland with the child.  The parties were able to reach agreement as to the father’s time with the child in Queensland while he lives interstate, and also what time he will spend with the child if the father relocates to Queensland.  Travel costs and how the child would travel were also negotiated and agreed upon by the parties.
• We filed a very comprehensive and detailed trial affidavit for our client seeking a Protection Order against our client’s former partner.  After serving our affidavit on the other party, the other party agreed to consent to the final Protection Order being made in our client’s favour, without needing to proceed further to the trial.
• We attended at a child mediation on behalf of our client, the primary carer of the children, in circumtances where the other parent was seeking equal time with the children.  We managed to settle the matter on a final basis on favourable terms to our client whereby our client remained the primary carer, and also negotiated the terms of a private Child Support Agreement, so that all child matters were resolved in the one day.

February 2021

• On two separate matters we commenced property settlement proceedings so as to keep “alive” and stop from lapsing, caveats registered against the former relationship homes, where the homes are solely registered in the other party’s name.  This ensures our clients’ interests are protected, with the homes not able to be sold, transferred, or further borrowed against, until property settlement matters are finalised.
• We reached a stalemate with regard to negotiations regarding a complex property matter involving rural farming properties, and therefore drafted Court documents to commence property settlement proceedings during which significant valuation issues will also need to be resolved.
• We received instructions to act on behalf of a parent where the other parent is unilaterally attempting to change child arrangements which have been in place for some time.  The parties will need to attend at mediation and if the matter cannot be resolved there, litigation will be the only way to resolve the matter.

January 2021

• As is usually the case in January, we dealt with a high volume of new clients who were waiting until the New Year before pushing forward with formally separating from their partner.
• We acted on behalf of a mother who was served with a last minute Protection Order Application filed by the father, seeking that the mother be ousted from the family home, with their children to be listed as associated persons needing protection on the Protection Order.  The mother filed her own Protection Order Application as against the father in the same terms, and at the first mention of the matter where both Applications were heard, the mother was successful in obtaining a Temporary Protection Order as against the father, but the father was unsuccessful in obtaining a Temporary Protection Order as against the mother, even though he was the party who started the Domestic Violence proceedings in the first place.

December 2020

• A quiet month with most staff taking annual leave. The OFL team celebrated a well deserved, end of year Christmas lunch.

November 2020

• Prepared in record time, Consent Order documents for a client who was wanting to urgently finalise an agreed property settlement with the other side.  Consent Order documents were drafted, finalised, and filed with the Family Court for approval within 7 days.  The Family Court approved and issued the Court Order shortly thereafter with the parties able to implement their settlement immediately.
• We had a very successful outcome at a domestic violence hearing where we acted for the husband accused of domestic violence, which the husband emphatically denied.  After cross-examination of the wife by our client’s barrister, that the wife realised her case was so flawed that she decided to withdraw her application half way through the hearing and did not pursue it.  The wife’s application was therefore dismissed and no domestic violence Order was made against the husband.
• We busily prepared last minute Court documents for an upcoming property settlement appearance on behalf of a client who retained us very shortly before the first Court appearance was due to take place.  We prepared for the Court appearance to such a high standard that Registrar we appeared before congratulated both lawyers for their excellent preparation and Court appearance.

October 2020

• We spent time inspecting subpoenaed documents at Court for a child matter which is being litigated.  The subpoenaed documents were useful as they were able to disprove much of what the other parent was falsely alleging as against our client, and will be able to be used as the matter progresses through the Court system to show the other parent’s habit of lying regarding child matters which will help our client’s case.
• A quite month with no Court appearances/mediations, but with many new initial consultations with clients seeking advice on property settlement, child matters, and contravention of Orders.

September 2020

• This month we finished preparing for, and attended at the final hearing of the unusual defacto property settlement matter referenced at June 2019 below.  We are happy to advise that our client was successful, with the Court finding the defacto relationship ended some 15 years ago, with the applicant’s case being dismissed.  The client was very happy as this meant no property settlement was required to be paid to the other party.
• We finalised a property settlement matter for a client where due to the other party not having emotionally accepted the separation initiated by our client, we were required to attend at two mediations and commence Court proceedings for settlement to be reached.  We were able to settle the matter with only one administrative Court appearance being required, with the client very happy that the matter was finally over.  This was a good example of needing to start Court proceedings to force the other party to co-operate with finalising property settlement matters where that party did not want to do so.

August 2020

• We successfully settled a high conflict, complex parenting matter at mediation, where there was a significant history of domestic violence according to the mother, all denied by the father, and with high animosity between the parties.  At the end of a very long day the parties were able to reach agreement with the advice of their respective solicitors and the effective mediation skills of the mediator.  A very long day, but a good result at the end of the day for the children.
• We appeared at the first Court mention date of a matter where the husband was in denial of the parties’ separation and therefore refused to meaningfully negotiate a property settlement without our client needing to start Court proceedings.  The filing of Court proceedings in this instance by the wife was required to move the matter along, resulting in the parties agreeing to the matter proceeding to private mediation for final resolution. The filing of Court proceedings meant the husband could no longer delay settlement with matter subsequently settling on a final basis at mediation.
• We resolved a complex property settlement matter at mediation where large inheritances received by our client at the very end of the parties’ relationship was a significant issue in dispute.  At the end of a very long day, our client was given the appropriate contribution adjustments for the inheritances received, and the matter was finally resolved without litigation being required.

July 2020

• Appeared at a mediation for a father who had not seen his children in two years due to not dealing well with the parties’ separation and a decline in his mental health.  The mother agreed to some initial supervised time, but ongoing time could not be agreed to, leading to the father needing to litigate the matter.  The father’s application will result in a Court Order being made allowing the father time with the children, with such time to be supervised in the first instance so as to reintroduce the children to the father.
• We documented and finalised many fixed fee Consent Order documents regarding property settlement matters, where parties had reached agreement direct between them as to the division of their assets/liabilities, needing us to only document the agreement by way of Consent Order documents subsequently filed with and approved by the Family Court.  A win/win for everyone.  Amicable and very affordable for both parties.

June 2020

• We received instructions to act on behalf of a parent in a same sex relationship, where the the other parent was not complying with a signed Parenting Order increasing the children’s time with our client.  Ultimately the dispute was resolved at mediation with the parties entering into a Consent Order whereby our client’s time with the children was immediately increased, and increased in the future to equal time. A good example of why parties need to enter into binding, enforceable Consent Orders when negotiating their children’s living arrangements, rather than entering into unenforceable, non-binding Parenting Plans.
• We finalised a high conflict property settlement matter for a husband where the property settlement asset pool was small, but where the parties could not agree on the percentage split of the overall settlement or the sale terms related to the sale of the home.  Ultimately, common sense prevailed and the parties reached final settlement on all issues.  A good example of where some times parties with less money argue more than high net worth individuals when it comes to negotiating a property settlement, as what is available to be divided is nominal and every cent counts.
• We received instructions to act on behalf of a party in child matters where the other party suffers from diagnosed Bipolar Disorder but where the other party refuses to accept the diagnosis and refuses to be medicated.  Difficult for our client in circumstances where not being medicated means reaching agreement with the other party is difficult due to the other party’s erratic and illogical behaviour.  Negotiation attempts are continuing.

May 2020

• After filing the application referred to in April below, the mother started complying with the Court Order and made up the father’s missed time with the children which she had not allowed, and ensured the children recommenced spending time with their father as per the Court Order.  The mother agreed to continue complying with the Court Order and the father was not required to proceed with his application to final hearing.
• We received many, many enquiries regarding the Covid 19 pandemic whereby parents who lived across the border in NSW were not wanting to send their children for time with their parent in QLD, and where parents did not want their children spending time with the other parent where that parent was a Doctor/Nurse on the basis that this increased the children’s risk at being exposed to the virus.  In 99% of these situations, the parents who were not allowing their children time with the other parent were incorrect in their position and we were responsible for ensuring time was complied with.

April 2020

• This month saw all of Australia dealing with unprecedented times.  The Covid 19 pandemic has changed our entire way of living.  Unfortunately, this has also seen parents with whom children live, attempting to unfairly deny the contact parent time with their children.  This is unacceptable and not permitted under the law.
• We filed an application on behalf of a father where the mother was refusing to comply with a Court Order and did not want to send the children to the father for his Court Ordered time.  The mother used the pandemic as an excuse for wanting to breach the Court Order.  We are awaiting the Court hearing.

March 2020

•  We received instructions to act on behalf of a client where possible child abuse allegations as against the other parent were made by the children.  A difficult matter where the parent had to weigh up the likelihood of the children’s allegations being true as against whether the children were exaggerating.  A decision was made to temporarily stop the other parent’s time with the children pending the allegations being investigated by the relevant authorities.
•  The matter referred to at the second bullet point of January 2020 below was resolved by consent on a final basis between the parties, whereby the parties agreed together with the help of a family therapist, to try and improve the relationship between the father and son.  Time between the father and son on a gradual basis was reintroduced.

February 2020

•  OFL solicitors spent time viewing webinars on how the Federal Circuit Court will now be dealing with all property settlement matters and small property settlement matters with a total net asset pool of less than $500,000.00.  Many new rules and procedures to be followed, with the Court strictly enforcing the new rules and procedures so as to finalise these property matters as a matter of priority.
•  We received instructions on a number of matters to legally document property settlement matters already directly agreed to between the parties.  We were able to document and file the appropriate Consent Order documents in each instance very quickly at a fixed fee price and finalise the agreed property settlements within a very short time-frame.

January 2020

•  A busy month dealing with new initial consults, which are typically quite high in the month of January in circumstances where couples have previously decided to separate, but do not formally do so until after the Christmas period.  The issues people needed help with ranged from simple property matters, complex property matters, child support matters and child matters.
• We prepared Court documents on behalf of a mother whose teenage son did not want to spend any time with his father in circumstances where the father’s behaviour both prior to and after separation had alienated the son from his father.  A difficult matter where the mother did want to the son to have a relationship with his father, but where the son steadfastly refused.

December 2019

•  A month of winding down for OFL staff leading up to the Christmas office closure period.

November 2019

•  We attended at a property mediation for a wife where the husband had previously refused all reasonable property offers made by the wife.  At mediation, the matter settled, and the wife received more than what she had previously offered the husband.  A good example as to why all parties should always seriously consider any reasonable property settlement offers made.
• We appeared in Court at the trial of a very wealthy husband where the net asset pool was in the millions.  The preparation leading up to this trial was very, very significant.  The preparation paid off as we were able to provide at Court all necessary documents required to support the husband’s assertions/counteract the wife’s arguments.  The Court decision is still pending.

October 2019

•  We successfully appeared in Court on behalf of a father seeking substantial time with his son in circumstances where time needed to take place in accordance with the father’s work roster.  The mother was opposed to this.  We successfully negotiated on behalf of the father on a final basis, more time than the mother was initially willing to give him, with such time to take place pursuant to the father’s work roster.
•  We appeared in Court on behalf of a father seeking that shared time with his daughter continue, in circumstances where the mother attempted to unilaterally reduce the father’s time.  No Order was made on the Court date reducing the father’s time as sought by the mother, with the parties subsequently negotiating on a final basis an Order whereby the daughter continued living with both parties on an shared care basis.

September 2019

•  We appeared in Court on behalf of a father whose former partner was refusing to enter into a Court Order by consent documenting their son’s living arrangements.  The father was left with no choice other than to commence Court proceedings.  At the first Court date, the mother not only agreed to document the child’s arrangements by an agreed Court Order, but also agreed to increase the father’s time with the child.
•  We received urgent instructions to act on behalf of a mother where the father separated their two young children, and unilaterally retained one child in his sole care, separating the two siblings, even though the mother had been the primary carer of both children since birth and after separation.  We managed to obtain an urgent Court date within days of the father retaining the child, at which the father agreed to return the child to the mother, and where the parties reached agreement on the terms of a final Court Order whereby the mother remained the primary carer for both children.

August 2019

• We settled at mediation on a final basis a very high conflict property settlement and children’s matter where the parties had continued living under the same roof after separation and where they had very different versions as to who was providing what care for the children.  Prior to the mediation the parties were involved in domestic violence proceedings and were highly distrustful of each other.  With the hard work of both their solicitors and an excellent mediator, against all odds, and after 9 hours of negotiation, the matter resolved by agreement at mediation.
•  Our junior Solicitor Mikaela Jordan attended an invaluable conference regarding Court-room advocacy skills with hands on tips from Judges, which will no doubt be of benefit to our clients.

July 2019

•  Preparation commenced for the drafting of Court material regarding a very high wealth contested property settlement.  The parties cannot agree on the percentage to be applied to the division of their wealth, with the Court needing to determine the matter.  The issue arises as to whether the bread winner should be awarded more than 50% due to the breadwinner’s greater financial contribution.  Watch this space.
• We obtained a final Court Order in default of a father’s appearance,  providing sole primary care to the mother, in circumstances where the father had previously been the children’s primary carer due to mental health issues suffered by the mother.  Sadly for the children, the father decided he no longer wanted to have a relationship with the children after the Court Ordered that the children live with the mother.

June 2019

• We settled a complex property settlement matter at mediation where the parties had been separated for 10 years and matrimonial funds had been inter mingled with post-separation property acquisitions.  The matter had been ongoing for some years and our client was very happy that the matter was finalised with all financial ties severed.
• We obtained instructions to act on behalf of a client who asserts that the parties’ defacto relationship ended some 15 years ago, with the other party asserting the relationship ended 2 years ago.  The Court will need to determine when the relationship ended before proceeding further.  If our client is successful, the case will be over with no defacto property settlement claim existing.

May 2019

• We settled a property settlement matter by way of Consent Orders for a very wealthy client with a net pool in excess of $10,000,000.00, where both parties were sensible, resulting in a just and equitable outcome for both.  The settlement was finalised at a small cost to the client given both parties were willing to negotiate a resolution quickly.
• We received instructions to act on behalf of a father with his matter involving property settlement, children and child support issues.  The father intends to relocate overseas, raising the issue of the jurisdiction of the Child Support Agency overseas and the father’s obligations. We were able to successfully negotiate regular time between the father and child where the father had been denied such time by the mother.

April 2019

• We appeared in Court on behalf of a mother involved in a very complex children’s matter where the children had not seen their father for some time due to serious allegations of family violence as against the father.  We prepared thoroughly for this appearance and had independent subpoenaed evidence to be submitted to the Court supporting the mother’s claims.  The parties consented to an interim supervised contact order being in place pending the preparation of a Family Report.
• We drafted and finalised on an urgent basis Consent Order documents for a client finalising both property and children’s matters where the other party had been refusing to negotiate or formalise a settlement on any issue.  Once our client was able to convince the other party to do so, we managed to draft the Consent Order documents in record time including very detailed child Orders and property Orders favourable to our client before the other party changed their mind.  Had the documents not been drafted as quickly, it is likely the agreement would not have been formalised.

March 2019

• We attended at mediation with our client whose parents had gifted to the parties hundreds and thousands of dollars where the other party tried to deny such gifts which were easily proven by the provision of bank statements.  After a difficult start to the mediation, we managed to settle property matters on a final basis, with our client receiving a just and equitable adjustment for the contribution made by her side of the family.
• We were involved in a settlement conference regarding a Wills and Estate dispute where a party to property settlement proceedings died during the Court proceedings.  The matter settled shortly after the settlement conference along the lines suggested by us so as to finalise the matter with the Estate not needing to fund thousands of dollar in legal fees.